Image source: Getty Photographs
Welcome to a series the set I destroy down and overview one of the vital most smartly-most approved substitute-traded funds (ETFs) on hand to Canadian investors!
The tech-heavy NASDAQ 100 Index is down over 22% year so a long way attributable to rising hobby charges and excessive market volatility. Basically the most up-to-date correction is truly a huge taking a mediate about for opportunity though. Thankfully, each and each BlackRock and BMO World Asset Management present a area of low-fee, excessive-liquidity ETFs that offer exposure to the NASDAQ 100.
The two tickers up for consideration this day are iShares NASDAQ 100 Hedged to Cad ETF (TSX:XQQ) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (TSX:ZQQ). Which one is the greater option? Support reading to catch out.
XQQ vs. ZQQ: Prices
The cost charged by an ETF is expressed as the management expense ratio (MER). Right here’s the proportion that is deducted from the ETF’s accumulate asset tag (NAV) over time and is calculated on an annual foundation. As an instance, an MER of 0.50% procedure that for each and each $10,000 invested, the ETF charges a fee of $50 yearly.
Both XQQ and ZQQ maintain an MER of 0.39%, making them tied on this entrance. For a $10,000 portfolio, either ZQQ or XQQ will fee you spherical $39 per year to protect.
XQQ vs. ZQQ: Size
The dimensions of an ETF is awfully vital. Funds with diminutive belongings beneath management (AUM) would possibly most likely maybe honest maintain sorrowful liquidity, low trading volume, excessive instruct-ask spreads, and extra threat of being delisted on account of lack of hobby.
XQQ has attracted AUM of $1.72 billion, whereas ZQQ has AUM of $1.34 billion. Even though each and each are enough for a expend-and-protect investor, XQQ is currently the extra approved ETF amongst Canadian investors.
XQQ vs. ZQQ: Holdings
Both XQQ and ZQQ track the NASDAQ 100 Index, which is made from a truly significant 100 non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ substitute. The index is tilted very much in direction of mega-cap increase stocks and is dominated by the technology and telecommunications sectors.
Both ETFs also expend currency hedging of their development. Theoretically, this vogue that XQQ’s or ZQQ’s tag is never any longer going to be littered with fluctuations between the CAD-USD. In educate, the depraved procedure the currency futures contracts are rolled forwards introduces monitoring error, which ends in a skedaddle on efficiency when put next to the index.
XQQ vs. ZQQ: Ancient efficiency
A cautionary assertion earlier than we dive in: previous efficiency is never any guarantee of future results, that would possibly most likely maybe honest and must vary. The portfolio returns offered beneath are hypothetical and backtested. The returns originate no longer mirror trading charges, transaction charges, or taxes, that would possibly most likely maybe honest area off skedaddle.
Right here are the trailing returns from 2012 to most up-to-date:
Right here are the annual returns from 2012 to most up-to-date:
XQQ and ZQQ performed identically, as expected from effectively-managed ETFs from indispensable fund suppliers. An absence of monitoring error as seen here is continuously a determined signal.
The Silly takeaway
It’s a coin toss here. Both ETFs maintain identical management expense ratios and efficiency. The finest difference here is AUM, and that gap isn’t vital enough to take XQQ over ZQQ. Truthfully, I would possibly most likely well correct expend whichever one sounds cooler at this fee.